linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for ast udc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:30:24 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
	Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
	Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for
 ast udc

On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:50:25PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>> We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host
> >>> may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.
> >>
> >> Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description?
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94
> >
> > Markus, please stop reviewing USB patches.  This is not helpful at all,
> > and causes new developers extra work for no reason at all.
> 
> How does this feedback fit to the linked information source?

That is not what I wrote.

I wrote, "Please stop reviewing USB patches."

Please stop now.

greg k-h