[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fa430f5-3e18-4c20-93d4-6733afd6bdcf@web.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:20:07 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Neal Liu <neal_liu@...eedtech.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] usb: gadget: aspeed_udc: validate endpoint index for
ast udc
>>>>> We should verify the bound of the array to assure that host
>>>>> may not manipulate the index to point past endpoint array.
>>>>
>>>> Why did you not choose an imperative wording for your change description?
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n94
>>>
>>> Markus, please stop reviewing USB patches. This is not helpful at all,
>>> and causes new developers extra work for no reason at all.
>>
>> How does this feedback fit to the linked information source?
>
> That is not what I wrote.
You indicated concerns according to patch review processes,
didn't you?
See also:
* Patch submission notes
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc5/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst#L100
* Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n3
> I wrote, "Please stop reviewing USB patches."
>
> Please stop now.
I might be going to influence evolution of this software area in other ways
under other circumstances.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists