[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EEE94730-C043-47D8-A50A-47332201B3BF@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:13:26 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing
List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"patches@...nelci.org"
<patches@...nelci.org>,
"lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org"
<lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
"pavel@...x.de" <pavel@...x.de>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com"
<f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com"
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
"srw@...dewatkins.net" <srw@...dewatkins.net>,
"rwarsow@....de" <rwarsow@....de>,
"conor@...nel.org" <conor@...nel.org>,
"allen.lkml@...il.com" <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org"
<broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/770] 5.10.220-rc1 review
Hi -
> On Jun 25, 2024, at 11:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 07:48:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 6/18/24 05:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.220 release.
>>> There are 770 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:32:00 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
>>> SUNRPC: Prepare for xdr_stream-style decoding on the server-side
>>>
>> The ChromeOS patches robot reports a number of fixes for the patches
>> applied in 5.5.220. This is one example, later fixed with commit
>> 90bfc37b5ab9 ("SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_decode's end-of-buffer
>> calculation"), but there are more. Are those fixes going to be
>> applied in a subsequent release of v5.10.y, was there a reason to
>> not include them, or did they get lost ?
>
> I saw this as well, but when I tried to apply a few, they didn't, so I
> was guessing that Chuck had merged them together into the series.
>
> I'll defer to Chuck on this, this release was all his :)
I did this port months ago, I've been waiting for the dust to
settle on the 6.1 and 5.15 NFSD backports, so I've all but
forgotten the status of individual patches.
If you (Greg or Guenter) send me a list of what you believe is
missing, I can have a look at the individual cases and then
run the finished result through our NFSD CI gauntlet.
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists