[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf232ba1-a3f3-4931-8775-254d42e261e5@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:29:24 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"patches@...nelci.org" <patches@...nelci.org>,
"lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
"pavel@...x.de" <pavel@...x.de>, "jonathanh@...dia.com"
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
"srw@...dewatkins.net" <srw@...dewatkins.net>,
"rwarsow@....de" <rwarsow@....de>, "conor@...nel.org" <conor@...nel.org>,
"allen.lkml@...il.com" <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/770] 5.10.220-rc1 review
On 6/25/24 08:13, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> Hi -
>
>> On Jun 25, 2024, at 11:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 07:48:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 6/18/24 05:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.220 release.
>>>> There are 770 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:32:00 +0000.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>
>>> [ ... ]
>>>> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
>>>> SUNRPC: Prepare for xdr_stream-style decoding on the server-side
>>>>
>>> The ChromeOS patches robot reports a number of fixes for the patches
>>> applied in 5.5.220. This is one example, later fixed with commit
>>> 90bfc37b5ab9 ("SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_decode's end-of-buffer
>>> calculation"), but there are more. Are those fixes going to be
>>> applied in a subsequent release of v5.10.y, was there a reason to
>>> not include them, or did they get lost ?
>>
>> I saw this as well, but when I tried to apply a few, they didn't, so I
>> was guessing that Chuck had merged them together into the series.
>>
>> I'll defer to Chuck on this, this release was all his :)
>
> I did this port months ago, I've been waiting for the dust to
> settle on the 6.1 and 5.15 NFSD backports, so I've all but
> forgotten the status of individual patches.
>
> If you (Greg or Guenter) send me a list of what you believe is
> missing, I can have a look at the individual cases and then
> run the finished result through our NFSD CI gauntlet.
>
This is what the robot reported so far:
1242a87da0d8 SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_encode's buflen calculation
Fixes: bddfdbcddbe2 ("NFSD: Extract the svcxdr_init_encode() helper")
90bfc37b5ab9 SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_decode's end-of-buffer calculation
Fixes: 5191955d6fc6 ("SUNRPC: Prepare for xdr_stream-style decoding on the server-side")
10396f4df8b7 nfsd: hold a lighter-weight client reference over CB_RECALL_ANY
Fixes: 44df6f439a17 ("NFSD: add delegation reaper to react to low memory condition")
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists