linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/770] 5.10.220-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B5D1D979-253A-4339-AF15-5DB3B8503698@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:08:56 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-stable
	<stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
	<patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds
	<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "patches@...nelci.org"
	<patches@...nelci.org>,
        "lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org"
	<lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
        "pavel@...x.de" <pavel@...x.de>,
        "jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com"
	<f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com"
	<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        "srw@...dewatkins.net" <srw@...dewatkins.net>,
        "rwarsow@....de" <rwarsow@....de>,
        "conor@...nel.org" <conor@...nel.org>,
        "allen.lkml@...il.com" <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org"
	<broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/770] 5.10.220-rc1 review



> On Jun 25, 2024, at 12:29 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> 
> On 6/25/24 08:13, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>> Hi -
>>> On Jun 25, 2024, at 11:04 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 07:48:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On 6/18/24 05:27, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.220 release.
>>>>> There are 770 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:32:00 +0000.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [ ... ]
>>>>> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
>>>>>     SUNRPC: Prepare for xdr_stream-style decoding on the server-side
>>>>> 
>>>> The ChromeOS patches robot reports a number of fixes for the patches
>>>> applied in 5.5.220. This is one example, later fixed with commit
>>>> 90bfc37b5ab9 ("SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_decode's end-of-buffer
>>>> calculation"), but there are more. Are those fixes going to be
>>>> applied in a subsequent release of v5.10.y, was there a reason to
>>>> not include them, or did they get lost ?
>>> 
>>> I saw this as well, but when I tried to apply a few, they didn't, so I
>>> was guessing that Chuck had merged them together into the series.
>>> 
>>> I'll defer to Chuck on this, this release was all his :)
>> I did this port months ago, I've been waiting for the dust to
>> settle on the 6.1 and 5.15 NFSD backports, so I've all but
>> forgotten the status of individual patches.
>> If you (Greg or Guenter) send me a list of what you believe is
>> missing, I can have a look at the individual cases and then
>> run the finished result through our NFSD CI gauntlet.
> 
> This is what the robot reported so far:
> 
> 1242a87da0d8 SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_encode's buflen calculation
>  Fixes: bddfdbcddbe2 ("NFSD: Extract the svcxdr_init_encode() helper")
> 90bfc37b5ab9 SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_decode's end-of-buffer calculation
>  Fixes: 5191955d6fc6 ("SUNRPC: Prepare for xdr_stream-style decoding on the server-side")
> 10396f4df8b7 nfsd: hold a lighter-weight client reference over CB_RECALL_ANY
>  Fixes: 44df6f439a17 ("NFSD: add delegation reaper to react to low memory condition")

My naive search found:

Checking commit 44df6f439a17 ...  
  upstream fix 10396f4df8b75ff6ab0aa2cd74296565466f2c8d not found
10396f4df8b75ff6ab0aa2cd74296565466f2c8d nfsd: hold a lighter-weight client reference over CB_RECALL_ANY
  upstream fix f385f7d244134246f984975ed34cd75f77de479f is already applied
Checking commit a2071573d634 ...  
  upstream fix f1aa2eb5ea05ccd1fd92d235346e60e90a1ed949 not found
f1aa2eb5ea05ccd1fd92d235346e60e90a1ed949 sysctl: fix proc_dobool() usability
Checking commit bddfdbcddbe2 ...  
  upstream fix 1242a87da0d8cd2a428e96ca68e7ea899b0f4624 not found
1242a87da0d8cd2a428e96ca68e7ea899b0f4624 SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_encode's buflen calculation
Checking commit 9fe61450972d ...     upstream fix 2111c3c0124f7432fe908c036a50abe8733dbf38 not found
2111c3c0124f7432fe908c036a50abe8733dbf38 namei: fix kernel-doc for struct renamedata and more
Checking commit 013c1667cf78 ...     upstream fix 2c0f0f3639562d6e38ee9705303c6457c4936eac not found
2c0f0f3639562d6e38ee9705303c6457c4936eac module: correctly exit module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol when fn() != 0
  upstream fix 1e80d9cb579ed7edd121753eeccce82ff82521b4 not found
1e80d9cb579ed7edd121753eeccce82ff82521b4 module: potential uninitialized return in module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol()
Checking commit 89ff87494c6e ...  
  upstream fix 5c11720767f70d34357d00a15ba5a0ad052c40fe not found
5c11720767f70d34357d00a15ba5a0ad052c40fe SUNRPC: Fix a NULL pointer deref in trace_svc_stats_latency()
Checking commit 5191955d6fc6 ...  
  upstream fix 90bfc37b5ab91c1a6165e3e5cfc49bf04571b762 not found
90bfc37b5ab91c1a6165e3e5cfc49bf04571b762 SUNRPC: Fix svcxdr_init_decode's end-of-buffer calculation
  upstream fix b9f83ffaa0c096b4c832a43964fe6bff3acffe10 not found
b9f83ffaa0c096b4c832a43964fe6bff3acffe10 SUNRPC: Fix null pointer dereference in svc_rqst_free()

I'll look into backporting the missing NFSD and SUNRPC patches.


--
Chuck Lever