[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fd713c2-5b85-4223-8a06-f2cedc2a1fb8@web.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:17:23 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@...vell.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>, Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH v2 0/7] octeontx2-af: Fix klockwork issues in AF
driver
…
> octeontx2-af: Fix klockwork issue in rvu_npc.c
>
> v2 changes:
> - Updated description for all the patchsets to address comment from Markus
…
* Why did you not directly respond to the recurring patch review concern
about better summary phrases (or message subjects)?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc5#n646
* Would you like to explain any more here which development concern categories
were picked up from the mentioned source code analysis tool?
* How much do you care for the grouping of logical changes into
consistent patch series?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists