linux-kernel - 6.10/regression/bisected - after f1d97e769152 I spotted increased execution time of the kswapd0 process and symptoms as if there is not enough memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABXGCsMmmb36ym8hVNGTiU8yfUS_cGvoUmGCcBrGWq9OxTrs+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:56:59 +0500
From: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>
To: Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, 
	fdmanana@...e.com, dsterba@...e.com, josef@...icpanda.com
Subject: 6.10/regression/bisected - after f1d97e769152 I spotted increased
 execution time of the kswapd0 process and symptoms as if there is not enough memory

Hi,
after f1d97e769152 I spotted increased execution time of the kswapd0
process and symptoms as if there is not enough memory.
Very often I see that kswapd0 consumes 100% CPU [1].
Before f1d97e769152 after an hour kswapd0 is working ~3:51 and after
three hours ~10:13 time.
After f1d97e769152 kswapd0 time increased to ~25:48 after the first
hour and three hours it hit 71:01 time.
So execution time has increased by 6-7 times.

f1d97e76915285013037c487d9513ab763005286 is the first bad commit
commit f1d97e76915285013037c487d9513ab763005286 (HEAD)
Author: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 22 18:02:59 2024 +0000

    btrfs: add a global per cpu counter to track number of used extent maps

    Add a per cpu counter that tracks the total number of extent maps that are
    in extent trees of inodes that belong to fs trees. This is going to be
    used in an upcoming change that adds a shrinker for extent maps. Only
    extent maps for fs trees are considered, because for special trees such as
    the data relocation tree we don't want to evict their extent maps which
    are critical for the relocation to work, and since those are limited, it's
    not a concern to have them in memory during the relocation of a block
    group. Another case are extent maps for free space cache inodes, which
    must always remain in memory, but those are limited (there's only one per
    free space cache inode, which means one per block group).

    Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
    Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
    Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
    Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>

 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c    |  9 +++++++++
 fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 fs/btrfs/fs.h         |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)

Unfortunately I can't check the revert commit f1d97e769152 because of conflicts.

> git reset --hard v6.10-rc1
HEAD is now at 1613e604df0c Linux 6.10-rc1

> git revert -n f1d97e76915285013037c487d9513ab763005286
Auto-merging fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
Auto-merging fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
Auto-merging fs/btrfs/fs.h
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/btrfs/fs.h
error: could not revert f1d97e769152... btrfs: add a global per cpu
counter to track number of used extent maps

However I double checked every bisect step and I am confident in the
correctness of the result.

I also attach here a full kernel log and build config.

My hardware specs: https://linux-hardware.org/?probe=d377acdb9e

Filipe can you look into this please?

[1] https://postimg.cc/Xrn6qfxh

-- 
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.

Download attachment ".config.zip" of type "application/zip" (66495 bytes)

Download attachment "dmesg.zip" of type "application/zip" (52548 bytes)