[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2c140d1-13db-4074-9ffd-e37d806e2136@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:44:37 +0200
From: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
To: Mudit Sharma <muditsharma.info@...il.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
lars@...afoo.de, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org
Cc: ivan.orlov0322@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: light: ROHM BH1745 colour sensor
On 25/06/2024 21:25, Mudit Sharma wrote:
> On 24/06/2024 23:27, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>>
>>> +static int bh1745_set_trigger_state(struct iio_trigger *trig, bool
>>> state)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret;
>>
>> Why is value initialized here? If regmap returns an error, you will not
>> use value anyway. I caught my eye because it is initialized here, and
>> not in the other functions where you use the same pattern.
>
> Hi Javier,
>
> Thank you for the review on this.
>
> 'value' is initialized here for case when we un-set the trigger. In that
> case, 'state' will be false and 'value' of 0 (default value for
> BH1745_INTR register) will be written.
>
I missed that case. Thanks for clarifying.
By the way, it might be beneficial to wait a bit longer before sending a
new version to give more reviewers a chance to look at your series.
24 hours might be a bit too short, and your version count could easily
skyrocket if more reviewers get involved.
Best regards,
Javier Carrasco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists