[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74215bff-933b-4d11-be2f-c1d5b5788f9e@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:45:26 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
george chan <gchan9527@...il.com>
Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT v3 0/5] Add sc7180 camss subsys support
On 25/06/2024 17:57, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 24.06.2024 5:03 PM, george chan wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:50 PM Bryan O'Donoghue
>> <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24/06/2024 13:13, George Chan via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>> - Add RFT tag to all patches, since no tested-by at all.
>>>
>>> Have you not tested this updated series ?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> bod
>>
>> Do you wanna add my tested-by too? It just feels weird to add my
>> tested-by that way.
>
> "RFT" means "I didn't actually test this" or "please provide more testing",
> not "there have not been tested-by's from others"
>
> Konrad
Exactly, RFT says to me "someone else needs to add testing here".
In your next drop with the changes and RBs please drop RFT - unless you
want someone else to test it for you.
I don't think that's required right now since the set seems
straight-forward enough and TBH the bit of 7180 hardware I have sits in
a box unopened and will likely stay that way for the next few months at
least.
I think your example video is proof enough the thing works ;)
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists