linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: i2c: nxp,lpc1788-i2c: convert to dt schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:02:05 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
 linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: i2c: nxp,lpc1788-i2c: convert to dt
 schema

On 25/06/2024 08:59, Kanak Shilledar wrote:
> Convert the NXP I2C controller for LPC2xxx/178x/18xx/43xx
> to newer DT schema. Created DT schema based on the .txt file
> which had `compatible`, `reg`, `interrupts`, `clocks`,
> `#address-cells` and `#size-cells` as required properties.
> 
> Additional changes to the original .txt binding
> - added maintainer from the MAINTAINERS file.
> - added resets property required by the corresponding DTS files.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - removed "address-cells" and "size-cells" as per feedback.

you already sent v3 so this is rather v4. What happened here? Why are
you resending this?

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof