linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: i2c: nxp,lpc1788-i2c: convert to dt schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <329ef10f-14d1-4346-8496-906aaf91ccfe@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 09:02:59 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
 linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: i2c: nxp,lpc1788-i2c: convert to dt
 schema

On 25/06/2024 09:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/06/2024 08:59, Kanak Shilledar wrote:
>> Convert the NXP I2C controller for LPC2xxx/178x/18xx/43xx
>> to newer DT schema. Created DT schema based on the .txt file
>> which had `compatible`, `reg`, `interrupts`, `clocks`,
>> `#address-cells` and `#size-cells` as required properties.
>>
>> Additional changes to the original .txt binding
>> - added maintainer from the MAINTAINERS file.
>> - added resets property required by the corresponding DTS files.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - removed "address-cells" and "size-cells" as per feedback.
> 
> you already sent v3 so this is rather v4. What happened here? Why are
> you resending this?

Ah, I see the changes - you dropped the incorrect tags. It's fine but it
should have been v4. Not sure how b4 or other tools will handle this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof