[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYAjKMSGmR4pc+LEfZ4NQArvgCEwy=ujzjOQus0K9j40w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 11:50:33 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, arnd@...db.de, afd@...com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk,
eric.devolder@...cle.com, robh@...nel.org, ardb@...nel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, lihuafei1@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: 9258/1: Fix callchain_trace() return value
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 5:23 AM Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com> wrote:
> perf_callchain_store() return 0 on success, -1 otherwise, fix
> callchain_trace() to return correct bool value. So walk_stackframe() can
> have a chance to stop walking the stack ahead.
>
> Fixes: 70ccc7c0667b ("ARM: 9258/1: stacktrace: Make stack walk callback consistent with generic code")
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Please put this into Russell's patch tracker.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists