[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b4353dc-f2bb-2c79-83ae-dc9a95572700@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:14:49 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <will@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
<namhyung@...nel.org>, <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
<jolsa@...nel.org>, <irogers@...gle.com>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
<kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <afd@...com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
<eric.devolder@...cle.com>, <robh@...nel.org>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <lihuafei1@...wei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: 9258/1: Fix callchain_trace() return value
On 2024/6/26 17:50, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 5:23 AM Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> perf_callchain_store() return 0 on success, -1 otherwise, fix
>> callchain_trace() to return correct bool value. So walk_stackframe() can
>> have a chance to stop walking the stack ahead.
>>
>> Fixes: 70ccc7c0667b ("ARM: 9258/1: stacktrace: Make stack walk callback consistent with generic code")
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Please put this into Russell's patch tracker.
Thank you, I'll put it, and could you please help to review another patch?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists