linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pps: clients: gpio: Bypass edge's direction check when not needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:55:40 +0200
From: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>
To: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, herve.codina@...tlin.com,
 christophercordahi@...ometrics.ca,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pps: clients: gpio: Bypass edge's direction check
 when not needed

Hi Rodolfo

On 4/25/24 14:42, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On 25/04/24 14:28, Bastien Curutchet wrote:
>> In the IRQ handler, the GPIO's state is read to verify the direction of
>> the edge that triggered the interruption before generating the PPS event.
>> If a pulse is too short, the GPIO line can reach back its original state
>> before this verification and the PPS event is lost.
>>
>> This check is needed when info->capture_clear is set because it needs
>> interruptions on both rising and falling edges. When info->capture_clear
>> is not set, interruption is triggered by one edge only so this check can
>> be omitted.
>>
>> Add a warning if irq_handler is left without triggering any PPS event.
>> Bypass the edge's direction verification when info->capture_clear is not
>> set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>
> 

I don't think I've received any updates since you acked this. Is there 
something missing before the patch can be applied?

Best regards,
Bastien