[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31841424-c6dd-49e2-ac2c-2394662b7f30@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:57:08 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: make cpufreq_boost_enabled return bool
On 6/27/2024 01:01, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> Since this function is supposed to return boost_enabled which is anyway
> a bool type make sure that it's return value is also marked as bool.
> This helps maintain better consistency in data types being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
> "return false" instead of 0 as per Mario's suggestion.
>
> Link to previous patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20240626084354.1762483-1-d-gole@ti.com/
>
> ---
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 82c500389a40..709e7b1f9826 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2873,7 +2873,7 @@ int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_enable_boost_support);
>
> -int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> +bool cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> {
> return cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 20f7e98ee8af..6f57de7de433 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ ssize_t cpufreq_show_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, char *buf);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state);
> -int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void);
> +bool cpufreq_boost_enabled(void);
> int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void);
> bool policy_has_boost_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>
> @@ -1164,9 +1164,9 @@ static inline int cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(int state)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -static inline int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> +static inline bool cpufreq_boost_enabled(void)
> {
> - return 0;
> + return false;
> }
>
> static inline int cpufreq_enable_boost_support(void)
>
> base-commit: df9574a57d02b265322e77fb8628d4d33641dda9
Powered by blists - more mailing lists