[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zn0NbIvFdfpMPHAx@dragon>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:57:48 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@...h.net>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
Cc: Vitor Soares <ivitro@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...adex.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: imx8mm-verdin: add TPM device
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> Hello Shawn,
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:33:50AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 02:41:50PM +0100, Vitor Soares wrote:
> > > From: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...adex.com>
> > >
> > > Add TPM device found on Verdin iMX8M Mini PID4 0090 variant.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...adex.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi | 16 +++++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi
> > > index 4768b05fd765..c9ae5f0bb526 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi
> > > @@ -227,15 +227,16 @@ &ecspi2 {
> > > pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi2>;
> > > };
> > >
> > > -/* Verdin CAN_1 (On-module) */
> > > +/* On-module SPI */
> > > &ecspi3 {
> > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > #size-cells = <0>;
> > > - cs-gpios = <&gpio5 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > > + cs-gpios = <&gpio5 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>, <&gpio4 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > - pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi3>;
> > > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi3>, <&pinctrl_pmic_tpm_ena>;
> >
> > Would it make more sense to have tpm pinctrl in node tpm@1 below?
> It's the pinctrl of the SPI Chip Select pin, not something about the
> TPM, I think it's correct to have it into the ecspi node.
The name pinctrl_pmic_tpm_ena seems confusing then.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists