linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send req/poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:49:47 +0800
From: Baokun Li <libaokun@...weicloud.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netfs@...ts.linux.dev, dhowells@...hat.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
 jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com, zhujia.zj@...edance.com,
 linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangerkun@...wei.com, houtao1@...wei.com,
 yukuai3@...wei.com, wozizhi@...wei.com, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>,
 Baokun Li <libaokun@...weicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send
 req/poll

On 2024/6/26 11:28, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/6/26 11:04, Baokun Li wrote:
>> A gentle ping.
>
> Since it's been long time, I guess you could just resend
> a new patchset with collected new tags instead of just
> ping for the next round review?
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang

Okay, if there's still no feedback this week, I'll resend this patch series.

Since both patch sets under review are now 5 patches and have similar
titles, it would be more confusing if they both had RESEND. So when I
resend it I will merge the two patch sets into one patch series.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li