| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:08:41 +0800 From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com> To: Baokun Li <libaokun@...weicloud.com> Cc: netfs@...ts.linux.dev, dhowells@...hat.com, jlayton@...nel.org, jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com, zhujia.zj@...edance.com, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangerkun@...wei.com, houtao1@...wei.com, yukuai3@...wei.com, wozizhi@...wei.com, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send req/poll On 2024/6/27 09:49, Baokun Li wrote: > On 2024/6/26 11:28, Gao Xiang wrote: >> >> >> On 2024/6/26 11:04, Baokun Li wrote: >>> A gentle ping. >> >> Since it's been long time, I guess you could just resend >> a new patchset with collected new tags instead of just >> ping for the next round review? >> >> Thanks, >> Gao Xiang > > Okay, if there's still no feedback this week, I'll resend this patch series. > > Since both patch sets under review are now 5 patches and have similar > titles, it would be more confusing if they both had RESEND. So when I > resend it I will merge the two patch sets into one patch series. Sounds fine, I think you could rearrange the RESEND patchset with the following order cachefiles: some bugfixes for withdraw and xattr cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send req/poll Jingbo currently is working on the internal stuff, I will try to review myself for this work too. Thanks, Gao Xiaang >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists