linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send req/poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d97a1e87-9571-453e-909c-4de17d1d67db@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 10:08:41 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun@...weicloud.com>
Cc: netfs@...ts.linux.dev, dhowells@...hat.com, jlayton@...nel.org,
 jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com, zhujia.zj@...edance.com,
 linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangerkun@...wei.com, houtao1@...wei.com,
 yukuai3@...wei.com, wozizhi@...wei.com, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send
 req/poll



On 2024/6/27 09:49, Baokun Li wrote:
> On 2024/6/26 11:28, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024/6/26 11:04, Baokun Li wrote:
>>> A gentle ping.
>>
>> Since it's been long time, I guess you could just resend
>> a new patchset with collected new tags instead of just
>> ping for the next round review?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gao Xiang
> 
> Okay, if there's still no feedback this week, I'll resend this patch series.
> 
> Since both patch sets under review are now 5 patches and have similar
> titles, it would be more confusing if they both had RESEND. So when I
> resend it I will merge the two patch sets into one patch series.

Sounds fine, I think you could rearrange the RESEND patchset with
the following order
cachefiles: some bugfixes for withdraw and xattr
cachefiles: some bugfixes for clean object/send req/poll

Jingbo currently is working on the internal stuff, I will try to
review myself for this work too.

Thanks,
Gao Xiaang

>