[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240628193514.1680137-1-kbusch@meta.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:35:14 -0700
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...a.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: fix recusive device locking
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
If one of the bus' devices has subordinates, the recursive call locks
itself, so no need to lock the device before the recusion or it will
surely deadlock.
Fixes: dbc5b5c0d268f87 ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()"
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
---
drivers/pci/pci.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 46beaf1815fab..d9f357812b3c5 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -5487,9 +5487,10 @@ static void pci_bus_lock(struct pci_bus *bus)
pci_dev_lock(bus->self);
list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
- pci_dev_lock(dev);
if (dev->subordinate)
pci_bus_lock(dev->subordinate);
+ else
+ pci_dev_lock(dev);
}
}
@@ -5501,7 +5502,8 @@ static void pci_bus_unlock(struct pci_bus *bus)
list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
if (dev->subordinate)
pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
- pci_dev_unlock(dev);
+ else
+ pci_dev_unlock(dev);
}
pci_dev_unlock(bus->self);
}
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists