[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB608394AA9279A8BC9134E61EFCD02@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:35:59 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, "Yu, Fenghua"
<fenghua.yu@...el.com>, "Wieczor-Retman, Maciej"
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, "Drew
Fustini" <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v22 09/18] x86/resctrl: Add a new field to struct
rmid_read for summation of domains
> For example, something like below inserted at this point in changelog:
>
> The new semantics rely on some struct rmid_read members having
> NULL values to distinguish between the SNC and non-SNC scenarios.
> resctrl can thus no longer rely on this struct not being initialized
> properly.
Just checking whether "resctrl" should be capitalized at the beginning of
a sentence. Digging through logs there are half-a-dozen places where it
got a "R" and three dozen where it didn't.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists