| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7ejdsieevuooprdaprn2ymqqv5ssd2fntlp6tsodeu6pvnuvue@chzg6ww45bni>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:16:24 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: luigi.leonardi@...look.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] vsock/virtio: add SIOCOUTQ support for
all virtio based transports
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 02:08:36PM GMT, Luigi Leonardi via B4 Relay wrote:
>From: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
>
>Introduce support for stream_bytes_unsent and seqpacket_bytes_unsent
>ioctl for virtio_transport, vhost_vsock and vsock_loopback.
>
>For all transports the unsent bytes counter is incremented
>in virtio_transport_get_credit.
>
>In the virtio_transport (G2H) the counter is decremented each
>time the host notifies the guest that it consumed the skbuffs.
>In vhost-vsock (H2G) the counter is decremented after the skbuff
>is queued in the virtqueue.
>In vsock_loopback the counter is decremented after the skbuff is
>dequeued.
>
>Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>
>---
> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 4 +++-
> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 7 +++++++
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 4 +++-
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 7 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>index ec20ecff85c7..dba8b3ea37bf 100644
>--- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>+++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
>@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ vhost_transport_do_send_pkt(struct vhost_vsock *vsock,
> restart_tx = true;
> }
>
>- consume_skb(skb);
>+ virtio_transport_consume_skb_sent(skb, true);
> }
> } while(likely(!vhost_exceeds_weight(vq, ++pkts, total_len)));
> if (added)
>@@ -451,6 +451,8 @@ static struct virtio_transport vhost_transport = {
> .notify_buffer_size = virtio_transport_notify_buffer_size,
> .notify_set_rcvlowat = virtio_transport_notify_set_rcvlowat,
>
>+ .unsent_bytes = virtio_transport_bytes_unsent,
The callback is named `unsent_bytes`, I'd use something similar also
in the function name, so `virtio_transport_unsent_bytes`, or the
opposite renaming the callback, as you prefer, but I'd use the same
for both.
>+
> .read_skb = virtio_transport_read_skb,
> },
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>index c82089dee0c8..e74c12878213 100644
>--- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
>@@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ struct virtio_vsock_sock {
> u32 peer_fwd_cnt;
> u32 peer_buf_alloc;
>
Can you remove this extra empty line, so it's clear that it is
protected by tx_lock?
>+ size_t bytes_unsent;
>+
> /* Protected by rx_lock */
> u32 fwd_cnt;
> u32 last_fwd_cnt;
>@@ -193,6 +195,11 @@ s64 virtio_transport_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> s64 virtio_transport_stream_has_space(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
> u32 virtio_transport_seqpacket_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
>
>+size_t virtio_transport_bytes_unsent(struct vsock_sock *vsk);
>+
>+void virtio_transport_consume_skb_sent(struct sk_buff *skb,
>+ bool consume);
>+
> int virtio_transport_do_socket_init(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> struct vsock_sock *psk);
> int
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>index 43d405298857..fc62d2818c2c 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
>@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static void virtio_transport_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
> while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len)) != NULL) {
>- consume_skb(skb);
>+ virtio_transport_consume_skb_sent(skb, true);
> added = true;
> }
> } while (!virtqueue_enable_cb(vq));
>@@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = {
> .notify_buffer_size = virtio_transport_notify_buffer_size,
> .notify_set_rcvlowat = virtio_transport_notify_set_rcvlowat,
>
>+ .unsent_bytes = virtio_transport_bytes_unsent,
>+
> .read_skb = virtio_transport_read_skb,
> },
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index 16ff976a86e3..3a7fa36f306b 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -463,6 +463,26 @@ void virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, struct sk_buff *
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt);
>
>+void virtio_transport_consume_skb_sent(struct sk_buff *skb, bool consume)
>+{
>+ struct sock *s = skb->sk;
>+
>+ if (s && skb->len) {
>+ struct vsock_sock *vs = vsock_sk(s);
>+ struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
>+
>+ vvs = vs->trans;
>+
>+ spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
>+ vvs->bytes_unsent -= skb->len;
>+ spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
>+ }
>+
>+ if (consume)
>+ consume_skb(skb);
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_consume_skb_sent);
>+
> u32 virtio_transport_get_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit)
> {
> u32 ret;
>@@ -475,6 +495,7 @@ u32 virtio_transport_get_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit)
> if (ret > credit)
> ret = credit;
> vvs->tx_cnt += ret;
>+ vvs->bytes_unsent += ret;
> spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
>
> return ret;
>@@ -488,6 +509,7 @@ void virtio_transport_put_credit(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 credit)
>
> spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
> vvs->tx_cnt -= credit;
>+ vvs->bytes_unsent -= credit;
> spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_put_credit);
>@@ -1090,6 +1112,19 @@ void virtio_transport_destruct(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_destruct);
>
>+size_t virtio_transport_bytes_unsent(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>+{
>+ struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs = vsk->trans;
>+ size_t ret;
>+
>+ spin_lock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
>+ ret = vvs->bytes_unsent;
>+ spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->tx_lock);
>+
>+ return ret;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_transport_bytes_unsent);
>+
> static int virtio_transport_reset(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>index 6dea6119f5b2..9098613561e3 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>@@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> .notify_buffer_size = virtio_transport_notify_buffer_size,
> .notify_set_rcvlowat = virtio_transport_notify_set_rcvlowat,
>
>+ .unsent_bytes = virtio_transport_bytes_unsent,
>+
> .read_skb = virtio_transport_read_skb,
> },
>
>@@ -123,6 +125,11 @@ static void vsock_loopback_work(struct work_struct *work)
> spin_unlock_bh(&vsock->pkt_queue.lock);
>
> while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&pkts))) {
>+ /* Decrement the bytes_sent counter without deallocating skb
^
Should be `bytes_unsent` ?
>+ * It is freed by the receiver.
>+ */
>+ virtio_transport_consume_skb_sent(skb, false);
>+
nit: no need for this new empty line.
> virtio_transport_deliver_tap_pkt(skb);
> virtio_transport_recv_pkt(&loopback_transport, skb);
> }
>
>--
>2.45.2
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists