[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202406282144.DxR5KwIu-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:42:27 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Luigi Leonardi via B4 Relay <devnull+luigi.leonardi.outlook.com@...nel.org>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Luigi Leonardi <luigi.leonardi@...look.com>,
Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl
for all vsock socket types.
Hi Luigi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 50b70845fc5c22cf7e7d25b57d57b3dca1725aa5]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Luigi-Leonardi-via-B4-Relay/vsock-add-support-for-SIOCOUTQ-ioctl-for-all-vsock-socket-types/20240627-023902
base: 50b70845fc5c22cf7e7d25b57d57b3dca1725aa5
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240626-ioctl_next-v3-1-63be5bf19a40%40outlook.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: add support for SIOCOUTQ ioctl for all vsock socket types.
config: i386-randconfig-141-20240628 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240628/202406282144.DxR5KwIu-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-8 (Ubuntu 8.4.0-3ubuntu2) 8.4.0
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406282144.DxR5KwIu-lkp@intel.com/
smatch warnings:
net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c:1321 vsock_do_ioctl() warn: unsigned 'n_bytes' is never less than zero.
vim +/n_bytes +1321 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
1295
1296 static int vsock_do_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
1297 int __user *arg)
1298 {
1299 struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
1300 struct vsock_sock *vsk;
1301 int retval;
1302
1303 vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
1304
1305 switch (cmd) {
1306 case SIOCOUTQ: {
1307 size_t n_bytes;
1308
1309 if (!vsk->transport || !vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
1310 retval = -EOPNOTSUPP;
1311 break;
1312 }
1313
1314 if (vsk->transport->unsent_bytes) {
1315 if (sock_type_connectible(sk->sk_type) && sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
1316 retval = -EINVAL;
1317 break;
1318 }
1319
1320 n_bytes = vsk->transport->unsent_bytes(vsk);
> 1321 if (n_bytes < 0) {
1322 retval = n_bytes;
1323 break;
1324 }
1325
1326 retval = put_user(n_bytes, arg);
1327 }
1328 break;
1329 }
1330 default:
1331 retval = -ENOIOCTLCMD;
1332 }
1333
1334 return retval;
1335 }
1336
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists