[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8ffd8a3c-83e6-4753-8bdf-7daa3a3d8306@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 15:30:37 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, richardcochran@...il.com,
geert+renesas@...der.be, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
nfraprado@...labora.com, u-kumar1@...com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add support for nsscc
node
On 26.06.2024 4:33 PM, Devi Priya wrote:
> Add a node for the nss clock controller found on ipq9574 based devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
> ---
Title: s/support for//
You're adding the node, not the support for it.
The nodes look good. Looking at the driver, the interconnect paths that will
be sync_state'd away due to no consumers don't seem to be super critical for
the system, so I'm assuming this doesn't crash
So, with the title fixed:
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists