linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] PM / devfreq: exynos: Use local clk variable instead of exynos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANAwSgRETDNtLLyh_5z-TXdkhRN_VwegDBZuaSyx=hXWkAJdRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:22:02 +0530
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, 
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, 
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] PM / devfreq: exynos: Use local clk variable
 instead of exynos_bus member

Hi Chamwoo,

On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 15:11, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This commit modifies the exynos bus driver to use a local clk variable
> for clock handling instead of storing it in the exynos_bus struct member.
> This helps in simplifying the code and makes it more readable.
>
> Suggested-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
> ---

I am letting you know that you missed this patch.

> v5: New patch
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> index 7d06c476d8e9..e55ae59a8ae7 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ struct exynos_bus {
>         unsigned long curr_freq;
>
>         int opp_token;
> -       struct clk *clk;
>         unsigned int ratio;
>  };
>
> @@ -241,13 +240,14 @@ static int exynos_bus_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
>  {
>         struct device *dev = bus->dev;
>         struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> +       struct clk *clk;
>         unsigned long rate;
>         int ret;
>
>         /* Get the clock to provide each bus with source clock */
> -       bus->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "bus");
> -       if (IS_ERR(bus->clk))
> -               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(bus->clk),
> +       clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "bus");
> +       if (IS_ERR(clk))
> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(clk),
>                                 "failed to get bus clock\n");
>
>         /* Get the freq and voltage from OPP table to scale the bus freq */
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> -       rate = clk_get_rate(bus->clk);
> +       rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
>
>         opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, &rate, 0);
>         if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> --
> 2.44.0
>
Thanks & Regards

-Anand