[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZoGP6uV2oD4AdYWP@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 07:03:38 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Serge Hallyn <sergeh@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent UAF in proc_cpuset_show()
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 11:20:58AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Under which circumstances would you become interested to apply statements
> like the following?
>
> * guard(rcu)();
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc5/source/include/linux/rcupdate.h#L1093
>
> * guard(spinlock_irq)(&css_set_lock);
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc5/source/include/linux/spinlock.h#L567
I don't really care either way. Neither makes meaningful difference here.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists