lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240701151436.GA41530@francesco-nb>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 17:14:36 +0200
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: Vitor Soares <ivitro@...il.com>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
	Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...adex.com>,
	linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] tpm_tis_spi: add missing attpm20p SPI device ID entry

On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 03:02:11PM +0000, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-06-21 at 10:50 +0100, Vitor Soares wrote:
> > From: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...adex.com>
> > 
> > "atmel,attpm20p" DT compatible is missing its SPI device ID entry, not
> > allowing module autoloading and leading to the following message:
> > 
> >   "SPI driver tpm_tis_spi has no spi_device_id for atmel,attpm20p"
> > 
> > Based on:
> >   commit 7eba41fe8c7b ("tpm_tis_spi: Add missing SPI ID")
> > 
> > Fix this by adding the corresponding "attpm20p" spi_device_id entry.
> > 
> > Fixes: 3c45308c44ed ("tpm_tis_spi: Add compatible string atmel,attpm20p")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...adex.com>
> 
> This is not a bug fix. This is a feature.

I believe that some maintainer have a different view on this kind of
patches compared to you, adding new device id would be material for
stable, or this specific issue preventing module auto loading.

I noticed that this specific view is not new from you, see
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CY54PJM8KY92.UOCXW1JQUVF7@suppilovahvero/.

With that said, I am ok with it.

Do you want a new patch version without Fixes/Cc:stable tags or you can
remove those while applying?

Francesco



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ