[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2febca9-59e4-4505-bbec-6e61f7d8b944@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:16:26 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>, "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com"
<pabeni@...hat.com>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: "efectn@...tonmail.com" <efectn@...tonmail.com>,
"dsimic@...jaro.org" <dsimic@...jaro.org>,
"jagan@...eble.ai" <jagan@...eble.ai>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arend@...adcom.com" <arend@...adcom.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "megi@....cz"
<megi@....cz>, "duoming@....edu.cn" <duoming@....edu.cn>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"minipli@...ecurity.net" <minipli@...ecurity.net>,
"brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev" <brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev>,
"brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com" <brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
Nick Xie <nick@...das.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add AP6275P wireless support
to Khadas Edge 2
On 01/07/2024 12:38, Jacobe Zang wrote:
>>> + pcie@0,0 {
>>> + reg = <0x400000 0 0 0 0>;
>>> + #address-cells = <3>;
>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>> + ranges;
>>> + device_type = "pci";
>>> + bus-range = <0x40 0x4f>;
>>> +
>>> + wifi: wifi@0,0 {
>> Where is the compatible (again!)? Test your code - you will see your
>> binding is a no-op.
>
> I tried to build kernel with CHECK_DTBS=1. And didn't get any message
> like 'compatible' is a required property in wifi node. But when I check
> the bindings that do required the compatible... So I will add it next time.
Yep, use different clock name and then test. You should see errors,
right? But there are not, because schema is not applied to this node at all.
Look how Apple is doing this.
I have doubts that your code works at all in the first place. If there
is no compatible, how your platform device gets of_node?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists