[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<TYZPR03MB7001C414251A2A844D121A0E80D32@TYZPR03MB7001.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 11:31:30 +0000
From: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>, "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "efectn@...tonmail.com" <efectn@...tonmail.com>, "dsimic@...jaro.org"
<dsimic@...jaro.org>, "jagan@...eble.ai" <jagan@...eble.ai>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "arend@...adcom.com" <arend@...adcom.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "megi@....cz"
<megi@....cz>, "duoming@....edu.cn" <duoming@....edu.cn>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, "minipli@...ecurity.net"
<minipli@...ecurity.net>, "brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev"
<brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev>, "brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com"
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>, Nick Xie <nick@...das.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add AP6275P wireless support
to Khadas Edge 2
>>> + pcie@0,0 {
>>> + reg = <0x400000 0 0 0 0>;
>>> + #address-cells = <3>;
>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>> + ranges;
>>> + device_type = "pci";
>>> + bus-range = <0x40 0x4f>;
>>> +
>>> + wifi: wifi@0,0 {
>> Where is the compatible (again!)? Test your code - you will see your
>> binding is a no-op.
>
> I tried to build kernel with CHECK_DTBS=1. And didn't get any message
> like 'compatible' is a required property in wifi node. But when I check
> the bindings that do required the compatible... So I will add it next time.
> Yep, use different clock name and then test. You should see errors,
> right? But there are not, because schema is not applied to this node at all.
>
> Look how Apple is doing this.
>
> I have doubts that your code works at all in the first place. If there
> is no compatible, how your platform device gets of_node?
In file brcm_hw_ids.h and pcie.c has added Device ID and Vendor ID
for bus to enumerate the device when board bootup, so I didn't add
specific compatible in DTS. And by doing so, it can probe successfully.
---
Best Regards
Jacobe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists