| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:42:05 +0800
From: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dj456119@...il.com, ryan.roberts@....com,
david@...hat.com, shy828301@...il.com, ziy@...dia.com, libang.li@...group.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Mingzhe Yang <mingzhe.yang@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: add per-order mTHP split counters
Hi Barry,
Thanks for taking time to review!
On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 8:02 AM Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 1:09 AM Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, the split counters in THP statistics no longer include
> > PTE-mapped mTHP. Therefore, we propose introducing per-order mTHP split
> > counters to monitor the frequency of mTHP splits. This will help developers
> > better analyze and optimize system performance.
> >
> > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepages-<size>/stats
> > split
> > split_failed
> > split_deferred
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Yang <mingzhe.yang@...com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
>
> Personally, I'm not convinced that using a temporary variable order
> makes the code
> more readable. Functions like folio_test_pmd_mappable() seem more readable to
Agreed. Using functions like folio_test_pmd_mappable() is more readable
for THP checks.
> me. In any case, it's a minor issue.
I'd like to hear other opinions as well ;)
>
> Acked-by: Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
Thanks again for your time!
Lance
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/huge_mm.h | 3 +++
> > mm/huge_memory.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > index 212cca384d7e..cee3c5da8f0e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > @@ -284,6 +284,9 @@ enum mthp_stat_item {
> > MTHP_STAT_FILE_ALLOC,
> > MTHP_STAT_FILE_FALLBACK,
> > MTHP_STAT_FILE_FALLBACK_CHARGE,
> > + MTHP_STAT_SPLIT,
> > + MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_FAILED,
> > + MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED,
> > __MTHP_STAT_COUNT
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index c7ce28f6b7f3..a633206375af 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -559,6 +559,9 @@ DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(swpout_fallback, MTHP_STAT_SWPOUT_FALLBACK);
> > DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(file_alloc, MTHP_STAT_FILE_ALLOC);
> > DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(file_fallback, MTHP_STAT_FILE_FALLBACK);
> > DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(file_fallback_charge, MTHP_STAT_FILE_FALLBACK_CHARGE);
> > +DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(split, MTHP_STAT_SPLIT);
> > +DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(split_failed, MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_FAILED);
> > +DEFINE_MTHP_STAT_ATTR(split_deferred, MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
> >
> > static struct attribute *stats_attrs[] = {
> > &anon_fault_alloc_attr.attr,
> > @@ -569,6 +572,9 @@ static struct attribute *stats_attrs[] = {
> > &file_alloc_attr.attr,
> > &file_fallback_attr.attr,
> > &file_fallback_charge_attr.attr,
> > + &split_attr.attr,
> > + &split_failed_attr.attr,
> > + &split_deferred_attr.attr,
> > NULL,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -3068,7 +3074,7 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> > XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, &folio->mapping->i_pages, folio->index, new_order);
> > struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
> > struct address_space *mapping = NULL;
> > - bool is_thp = folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio);
> > + int order = folio_order(folio);
> > int extra_pins, ret;
> > pgoff_t end;
> > bool is_hzp;
> > @@ -3076,7 +3082,7 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> > VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
> > VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
> >
> > - if (new_order >= folio_order(folio))
> > + if (new_order >= order)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> > @@ -3253,8 +3259,9 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list,
> > i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
> > out:
> > xas_destroy(&xas);
> > - if (is_thp)
> > + if (order >= HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)
> > count_vm_event(!ret ? THP_SPLIT_PAGE : THP_SPLIT_PAGE_FAILED);
> > + count_mthp_stat(order, !ret ? MTHP_STAT_SPLIT : MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_FAILED);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -3278,13 +3285,14 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio)
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
> > #endif
> > + int order = folio_order(folio);
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > /*
> > * Order 1 folios have no space for a deferred list, but we also
> > * won't waste much memory by not adding them to the deferred list.
> > */
> > - if (folio_order(folio) <= 1)
> > + if (order <= 1)
> > return;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -3305,8 +3313,9 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio)
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
> > if (list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
> > - if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio))
> > + if (order >= HPAGE_PMD_ORDER)
> > count_vm_event(THP_DEFERRED_SPLIT_PAGE);
> > + count_mthp_stat(order, MTHP_STAT_SPLIT_DEFERRED);
> > list_add_tail(&folio->_deferred_list, &ds_queue->split_queue);
> > ds_queue->split_queue_len++;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists