[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240702171858.187562-1-andrii@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:18:58 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
To: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de,
jpoimboe@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
rihams@...com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe
When tracing user functions with uprobe functionality, it's common to
install the probe (e.g., a BPF program) at the first instruction of the
function. This is often going to be `push %rbp` instruction in function
preamble, which means that within that function frame pointer hasn't
been established yet. This leads to consistently missing an actual
caller of the traced function, because perf_callchain_user() only
records current IP (capturing traced function) and then following frame
pointer chain (which would be caller's frame, containing the address of
caller's caller).
So when we have target_1 -> target_2 -> target_3 call chain and we are
tracing an entry to target_3, captured stack trace will report
target_1 -> target_3 call chain, which is wrong and confusing.
This patch proposes a x86-64-specific heuristic to detect `push %rbp`
(`push %ebp` on 32-bit architecture) instruction being traced. Given
entire kernel implementation of user space stack trace capturing works
under assumption that user space code was compiled with frame pointer
register (%rbp/%ebp) preservation, it seems pretty reasonable to use
this instruction as a strong indicator that this is the entry to the
function. In that case, return address is still pointed to by %rsp/%esp,
so we fetch it and add to stack trace before proceeding to unwind the
rest using frame pointer-based logic.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
---
v1->v2:
- use native unsigned long for ret_addr (Peter);
- add same logic for compat logic in perf_callchain_user32 (Peter).
arch/x86/events/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/uprobes.h | 2 ++
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index 5b0dd07b1ef1..60821c1ff2f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -2833,6 +2833,19 @@ perf_callchain_user32(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *ent
fp = compat_ptr(ss_base + regs->bp);
pagefault_disable();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
+ /* see perf_callchain_user() below for why we do this */
+ if (current->utask) {
+ struct arch_uprobe *auprobe = current->utask->auprobe;
+ u32 ret_addr;
+
+ if (auprobe && auprobe->insn[0] == 0x55 /* push %ebp */ &&
+ !__get_user(ret_addr, (const u32 __user *)regs->sp))
+ perf_callchain_store(entry, ret_addr);
+ }
+#endif
+
while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
if (!valid_user_frame(fp, sizeof(frame)))
break;
@@ -2884,6 +2897,26 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs
return;
pagefault_disable();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
+ /*
+ * If we are called from uprobe handler, and we are indeed at the very
+ * entry to user function (which is normally a `push %rbp` instruction,
+ * under assumption of application being compiled with frame pointers),
+ * we should read return address from *regs->sp before proceeding
+ * to follow frame pointers, otherwise we'll skip immediate caller
+ * as %rbp is not yet setup.
+ */
+ if (current->utask) {
+ struct arch_uprobe *auprobe = current->utask->auprobe;
+ unsigned long ret_addr;
+
+ if (auprobe && auprobe->insn[0] == 0x55 /* push %rbp/%ebp */ &&
+ !__get_user(ret_addr, (const unsigned long __user *)regs->sp))
+ perf_callchain_store(entry, ret_addr);
+ }
+#endif
+
while (entry->nr < entry->max_stack) {
if (!valid_user_frame(fp, sizeof(frame)))
break;
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index b503fafb7fb3..a270a5892ab4 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ struct uprobe_task {
struct uprobe *active_uprobe;
unsigned long xol_vaddr;
+ struct arch_uprobe *auprobe;
+
struct return_instance *return_instances;
unsigned int depth;
};
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 99be2adedbc0..6e22e4d80f1e 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -2082,6 +2082,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
bool need_prep = false; /* prepare return uprobe, when needed */
down_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
+ current->utask->auprobe = &uprobe->arch;
for (uc = uprobe->consumers; uc; uc = uc->next) {
int rc = 0;
@@ -2096,6 +2097,7 @@ static void handler_chain(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
remove &= rc;
}
+ current->utask->auprobe = NULL;
if (need_prep && !remove)
prepare_uretprobe(uprobe, regs); /* put bp at return */
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists