linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202407021358.D259DF0BCA@keescook>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:59:05 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org,
	wad@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, arnd@...db.de,
	ardb@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
	rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, leobras@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry

On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:01:42AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024/7/1 23:40, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 04:55:58PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - Test the MTE test cases.
> >> - Handle forget_syscall() in arch_post_report_syscall_entry()
> >> - Make the arch funcs not use __weak as Thomas suggested, so move
> >>   the arch funcs to entry-common.h, and make arch_forget_syscall() folded
> >>   in arch_post_report_syscall_entry() as suggested.
> >> - Move report_single_step() to thread_info.h for arm64
> >> - Change __always_inline() to inline, add inline for the other arch funcs.
> >> - Remove unused signal.h for entry-common.h.
> >> - Add Suggested-by.
> >> - Update the commit message.
> > 
> > I didn't see the mentioned feedback from tglx in any of the threads. Is
> > lore busted or is there discussion on this series happening somewhere
> > else?
> 
> It Seems Thomas only sent it to me without a public email.

Ah ha! Okay, thanks. I thought I was missing some discussion somewhere. :)

-- 
Kees Cook