[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab934094-ec54-b580-512e-199017ca99fc@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:01:42 +0800
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <oleg@...hat.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<wad@...omium.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<ardb@...nel.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <leobras@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry
On 2024/7/1 23:40, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 04:55:58PM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Test the MTE test cases.
>> - Handle forget_syscall() in arch_post_report_syscall_entry()
>> - Make the arch funcs not use __weak as Thomas suggested, so move
>> the arch funcs to entry-common.h, and make arch_forget_syscall() folded
>> in arch_post_report_syscall_entry() as suggested.
>> - Move report_single_step() to thread_info.h for arm64
>> - Change __always_inline() to inline, add inline for the other arch funcs.
>> - Remove unused signal.h for entry-common.h.
>> - Add Suggested-by.
>> - Update the commit message.
>
> I didn't see the mentioned feedback from tglx in any of the threads. Is
> lore busted or is there discussion on this series happening somewhere
> else?
It Seems Thomas only sent it to me without a public email.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists