[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7559dbb323d16fb334f8f8f35b8fda3fb6e481c.camel@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:48:37 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@....fi>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>, Linux regressions mailing list
<regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: Call tpm2_sessions_init() to initialize
session support
On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 15:14 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Applying it is probably the better path forward than restricting HMAC to
> x86_64 now and enabling it on a per-architecture basis afterwards ...
Why is this here and not in the associated patch?
Any, what argue against is already done for v6.10.
The actual bug needs to be fixed before anything
else.
I can look at the patch when in August (back from
holiday) but please response to the correct patch
next time, thanks.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists