linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: Call tpm2_sessions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <85f882ff079554c41a73d8ad4275072c5229f716.camel@iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 02:57:14 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@....fi>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>, Linux regressions mailing list
	 <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: ibmvtpm: Call tpm2_sessions_init() to initialize
 session support

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 02:48 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-07-01 at 15:14 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > Applying it is probably the better path forward than restricting HMAC to 
> > x86_64 now and enabling it on a per-architecture basis afterwards ...
> 
> Why is this here and not in the associated patch?
> 
> Any, what argue against is already done for v6.10.
> 
> The actual bug needs to be fixed before anything
> else.
> 
> I can look at the patch when in August (back from
> holiday) but please response to the correct patch
> next time, thanks.

Next steps forward:

1  Comment out sessions_init().
2. See what happens on x86 in QEMU.
3. All errors were some sort size errors, so look into failing
   sites and fixup the use of hmac shenanigans.

BR, Jarkko