[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b19c43e-6b13-4b09-9498-ee0b24749d3f@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 23:17:01 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Stephen
Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski
<bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] clk: qcom: Add support for Display clock Controllers
on SA8775P
On 6/21/2024 10:03 AM, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Please merge this into one to save on boilerplate, take a look
>> at dispcc-sc8280xp.c
>>
>
> I did take a look at the dispcc for SC8280XP before posting the series,
> but it kind of looked tricky to add fixes for a particular dispcc.
> Debugging could also be difficult in my opinion.
> Though I understand that we are trying to optimize by re-using few
> common structures/probe but from clocks side they are all redefined.
> That was the reason to keep them separate.
Konrad, are you good with the proposal to keep the two instance of
display clock controllers as separate drivers? As I looking to post
the next patch series, please let me know your comments.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Taniya Das.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists