lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c5d89e7-b5cf-4a51-9bd7-24fbae1b7c62@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:41:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, Bjorn Andersson
 <andersson@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 quic_jkona@...cinc.com, quic_imrashai@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add SA8775P video clock
 controller

On 21/06/2024 06:24, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/13/2024 12:58 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/06/2024 12:47, Taniya Das wrote:
>>> Add device tree bindings for the video clock controller on Qualcomm
>>> SA8775P platform.
>>
>> You claim it is a v1, but I saw it and already commented on this. No
>> changelog, no versioning, so my comments were ignored?
>>
>> Please go back to previous comments, implement then, respond and then
>> send v3 with all comments addressed.
>>
> 
> Krzysztof, I mentioned the below in the cover letter of this series. Did 
> I still miss something?
> 
> Add support for videocc, camcc, dispcc0 and dispcc1 on Qualcomm SA8775P
> platform.
> 
> These multimedia clock controller and device tree patches are split
> from the below series.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240531090249.10293-1-quic_tdas@quicinc.com/

But this does not invalidate patch history. If you sent patch in foo
patchset, then sending v2 of this patch in bar patchset is still v2, not
v1. You still need changelog and proper versioning.

So again - respond to previous comments and/or implement them, then
provide changelog what happened.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ