linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move uclamp to each sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZoWUrdj4ZT61KY4l@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 08:13:01 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia2@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Move uclamp to each sched_class

Hello,

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Hongyan Xia wrote:
> Hi. I only just started looking at sched_ext a couple of days ago so
> feel free to correct me if sched_ext patches have different rules,
> different cc's and different mailing lists than normal LKML.

The first patch should go through the usual scheduler tree, so please cc the
scheduler maintainers and probably the original uclamp author too. Once that
lands, I can pull in and apply the second sched_ext specific patch.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun