[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202407031518.7320BBC9E3@keescook>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:20:17 -0700
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/53] workqueue: Introduce the create*_workqueue2()
macros
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 02:28:34PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 7/3/24 1:24 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > This can be done with the preprocessor to detect how many arguments
> > are being used, so then there is no need to do the renaming passes and
> > conversions can land via subsystems:
>
> Thanks Kees, this is very useful feedback.
>
> As one can see here, Tejun requested not to add support for a format
> string in the create*_workqueue() macros:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/ZoMF1ZydZUusxRcf@slm.duckdns.org/
Ah! I should have read the thread more fully. :)
> Hence a different approach for the SCSI create*_workqueue() macros:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20240702215228.2743420-1-bvanassche@acm.org/
Gotcha. Okay, well, that's a lot of flags to open-code, but I guess
that's fine? :P
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists