[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <otsopuw5pqpe637mywdoecnv5xhfhcny5xsxnwoyxhy7gj5yy6@3s43zn2udeei>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:19:33 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v6] i2c: pnx: Fix potential deadlock warning from
del_timer_sync() call in isr
Hi Piotr,
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 11:13:06AM GMT, Piotr Wojtaszczyk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 1:01 AM Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > @@ -653,7 +624,10 @@ static int i2c_pnx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > alg_data->adapter.algo_data = alg_data;
> > > alg_data->adapter.nr = pdev->id;
> > >
> > > - alg_data->timeout = I2C_PNX_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT;
> > > + alg_data->timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(I2C_PNX_TIMEOUT_DEFAULT);
> > > + if (alg_data->timeout <= 1)
> > > + alg_data->timeout = 2;
> >
> > I don't see the need for this check. The default timeout is
> > defined as 10.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andi
>
> That's the timeout value which was in the previous timer in i2c_pnx_arm_timer(),
> without this I had time out events.
I meant the if() statement. We are sure timeout is not <= 1 at
this point.
Anyway, it doesn't matter. I applied the patch in
i2c/i2c-host-next.
Thanks,
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists