lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY+nuSWz7rnVVUpF_mZOfDUb_6fgoJpnG2Pt-+AGLqt0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:10:09 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Cong Yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
Cc: sam@...nborg.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch, 
	dianders@...omium.org, swboyd@...omium.org, airlied@...il.com, 
	dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, 
	robh+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	lvzhaoxiong@...qin.corp-partner.google.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/panel: jd9365da: Support for Melfas
 lmfbx101117480 MIPI-DSI panel

On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 3:02 PM Cong Yang
<yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com> wrote:

> The Melfas lmfbx101117480 is a 10.1" WXGA TFT-LCD panel, use jd9365da
> controller, which fits in nicely with the existing panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3
> driver. Hence, we add a new compatible with panel specific config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>

This is certainly OK
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

> +static int melfas_lmfbx101117480_init_cmds(struct jadard *jadard)
> +{
> +       struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = jadard->dsi };
> +
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0xe0, 0x00);
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0xe1, 0x93);
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0xe2, 0x65);
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0xe3, 0xf8);
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0x80, 0x03);
> +       mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(&dsi_ctx, 0xe0, 0x01);

Until this point *all* displays have the same init sequence, what about
a follow-up patch that start to break things that are always the
same into helper functions?

These sequences all have a lot of the same magic bytes, so if
you guys have a datasheet for this display controller then start
adding gradually some #defines for the e0, e1, e2 etc commands
please.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ