[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AM6PR04MB59419639315434DBFF2F13B688DE2@AM6PR04MB5941.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 10:46:42 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, "Peng Fan (OSS)"
<peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: "cristian.marussi@....com" <cristian.marussi@....com>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org"
<arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system
power protocol
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support
> system power protocol
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is
> 0x12.
> >
>
> I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or any
> other required property.
I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And
Cristian gave some comments:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
i.MX95 no need dedicated channel for this node, but others may
have. So I repost this patch, and with this binding change,
the dtbs_check could pass for i.MX95 dts.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists