linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB8459EB8FC25AFF6D7C912F2A88AC2@PAXPR04MB8459.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 12:15:20 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, "Peng
 Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: "cristian.marussi@....com" <cristian.marussi@....com>, "robh@...nel.org"
	<robh@...nel.org>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org"
	<arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system
 power protocol

Hi Sudeep,

> Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support
> system power protocol
> 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> support
> > system power protocol
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > >
> > > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id is
> > 0x12.
> > >
> >
> > I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or any
> > other required property.
> 
> I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And Cristian
> gave some comments:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
>

Please suggest what should I do to avoid the dtbs_check issue.

Should I switch back to 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
or else?

Thanks,
Peng.

> i.MX95 no need dedicated channel for this node, but others may have.
> So I repost this patch, and with this binding change, the dtbs_check
> could pass for i.MX95 dts.
> 
> Thanks,
> Peng.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep