[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK-xaQb2OrgNOKKXp8d_43kqMNyuHxS1V8jSDL6PdNZPTv79+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:47:06 +0200
From: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...il.com>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...nel.org>
Cc: Mikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@...il.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
dsterba@...e.com, josef@...icpanda.com
Subject: Re: 6.10/regression/bisected - after f1d97e769152 I spotted increased
execution time of the kswapd0 process and symptoms as if there is not enough memory
Il giorno gio 4 lug 2024 alle ore 15:33 Andrea Gelmini
<andrea.gelmini@...il.com> ha scritto:
> Well, I have the nighlty snapshot (well, it's not on every subvolume
> of the fs). I ran tar on that, and we see.
Well, using the laptop for daily work and running tar on snapshots,
recreate the issue.
I am collecting the htop output and bfptrace.
I send you everything when I collect enough data.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists