lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4b1b2cc-79ab-4e88-a38c-40b89d1c4d69@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 08:55:07 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Vadhavana <av2082000@...il.com>,
 "Ricardo B . Marliere" <ricardo@...liere.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] slimbus: Fix struct and documentation alignment in
 stream.c



On 05/07/2024 08:53, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 08:40:40AM +0100, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org wrote:
>> From: Amit Vadhavana <av2082000@...il.com>
>>
>> The placement of the `segdist_codes` array documentation was corrected
>> to conform with kernel documentation guidelines. The `@...dist_codes`
>> was placed incorrectly within the struct `segdist_code` documentation
>> block, which led to a potential misinterpretation of the code structure.
>>
>> The `segdist_codes` array documentation was moved outside the struct
>> block, and a separate comment block was provided for it. This change
>> ensures that clarity and proper alignment with kernel documentation
>> standards are maintained.
>>
>> A kernel-doc warning was addressed:
>>      ./drivers/slimbus/stream.c:49: warning: Excess struct member 'segdist_codes' description in 'segdist_code'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Vadhavana <av2082000@...il.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <ricardo@...liere.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/slimbus/stream.c | 8 +++++---
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> I don't think this was ment to be sent as part of the fastrpc patch
> series :(
> 
> Can you fix this up and resend a v2?

True, this patch ended up in the folder.. did not realize that!

will resend!

thanks,
Srini
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ