[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240705140020.J2dyu3fZ@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:00:20 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] task_work: Add TWA_NMI_CURRENT as an additional
notify mode.
On 2024-07-04 19:03:36 [+0200], To linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
> index 2134ac8057a94..05fb41fe09f5d 100644
> --- a/kernel/task_work.c
> +++ b/kernel/task_work.c
> @@ -1,10 +1,19 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <linux/irq_work.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/task_work.h>
> #include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
> +#include <trace/events/ipi.h>
Just noticed that this trace include does not belong here. It is a
leftover from an earlier iteration where I intended to use
smp_send_reschedule() instead of irq_work…
Should I repost the series, or just this one?
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists