linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] task_work: Add TWA_NMI_CURRENT as an additional notify mode.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240705145828.GD11386@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:58:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] task_work: Add TWA_NMI_CURRENT as an additional
 notify mode.

On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 04:00:20PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2024-07-04 19:03:36 [+0200], To linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c
> > index 2134ac8057a94..05fb41fe09f5d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/task_work.c
> > +++ b/kernel/task_work.c
> > @@ -1,10 +1,19 @@
> >  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +#include <linux/irq_work.h>
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >  #include <linux/task_work.h>
> >  #include <linux/resume_user_mode.h>
> > +#include <trace/events/ipi.h>
> 
> Just noticed that this trace include does not belong here. It is a
> leftover from an earlier iteration where I intended to use
> smp_send_reschedule() instead of irq_work…
> 
> Should I repost the series, or just this one?

I'll zap it. no worries.