[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C5231A8D-C529-4BAC-9E2D-32F00321A294@live.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:56:05 +0000
From: Aditya Garg <gargaditya08@...e.com>
To: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "oneukum@...e.com" <oneukum@...e.com>, "stern@...land.harvard.edu"
<stern@...land.harvard.edu>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, "usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net"
<usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>, Kerem Karabay <kekrby@...il.com>,
Orlando Chamberlain <orlandoch.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: core: add 'shutdown' callback to usb_driver
Hi Greg
> On 6 Jul 2024, at 1:43 PM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 11:21:06AM +0000, Aditya Garg wrote:
>> From: Kerem Karabay <kekrby@...il.com>
>>
>> This simplifies running code on shutdown for USB drivers.
>>
>
> Sorry, but this does not explain why this is needed at all :(
>
> Where did this change come from? What problem does it solve? Why
> should we take it?
>
Currently there is no standardized method for USB drivers to handle
shutdown events. This patch simplifies running code on shutdown for USB
devices by adding a shutdown callback to usb_driver. It also implements the
new method to existing "USB Attached SCSI” driver that required shutdown
Is this good enough?
> I think I know the answers to these questions, but you need to document
> it here as to why it is needed (please read the kernel documentation for
> how to write a good changelog text and subject line.)
The subject looks fine to me. If you think it can be improved, suggestions shall be appreciated.
Thanks
Aditya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists