[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ffe1d11-8442-40fc-bb93-581e9d1c93ab@web.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 15:47:02 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PMIC: Remove unneeded check in
tps68470_pmic_opregion_probe()
> In tps68470_pmic_opregion_probe() pointer 'dev' is compared to NULL which
> is useless.
because …?
> Fix this issue by removing unneeded check.
Another wording suggestion:
Thus remove a redundant check (and …?).
…
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pmic/tps68470_pmic.c
> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int tps68470_pmic_opregion_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct tps68470_pmic_opregion *opregion;
> acpi_status status;
>
> - if (!dev || !tps68470_regmap) {
> + if (!tps68470_regmap) {
> dev_warn(dev, "dev or regmap is NULL\n");
…
Would you like to adjust the passed string literal accordingly?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists