[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vefw5FB1mK8v-FJ5MBeSo_N9fgiAFPdYw2w_OCX5UxrAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:38:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru>
Cc: Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / PMIC: Remove unneeded check in tps68470_pmic_opregion_probe()
On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 1:36 PM Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@...rgos.ru> wrote:
>
> In tps68470_pmic_opregion_probe() pointer 'dev' is compared to NULL which
> is useless.
>
> Fix this issue by removing unneeded check.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
...
> - if (!dev || !tps68470_regmap) {
> + if (!tps68470_regmap) {
> dev_warn(dev, "dev or regmap is NULL\n");
Now this message is misleading.
> return -EINVAL;
> }
And I dunno why it's a warning and not an error level.
With all above being said, I would recommend to update to
if (!tps68470_regmap)
return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "regmap is missing\n");
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists