[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d109ab0-ebd0-4739-a15e-958e82552a7d@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 09:32:18 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Yang Li <yang.li@...ogic.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Add power sequence for Amloigc
WCN chips
On 08/07/2024 08:32, Yang Li wrote:
>
> 在 2024/7/8 14:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>>
>> On 08/07/2024 08:04, Yang Li wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> +required:
>>>>> + - compatible
>>>>> + - clocks
>>>>> + - clock-names
>>>>> + - amlogic,chip-enable-gpios
>>>>> + - amlogic,bt-enable-gpios
>>>>> +
>>>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>>>> +
>>>>> +examples:
>>>>> + - |
>>>>> + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>>>>> + wcn_pwrseq {
>>>> No underscores in node names, generic node names.
>>>>
>>>> There is no device as "pwrseq". I also do not get what "wcn" means here.
>>> Yes, I understand.
>>>
>>> Can I change "wcn_pwrseq" to "pmu", and do I need to change the binding
>> What is pmu for your device? What is this device in the first place you
>> are documenting? Where is the datasheet?
>
> ^_^ Well, You are right, the "pmu" wasn't really fit in here.
>
> I'd like to explain the current usage first, and could you please give
> me a suggestion?
>
> This module(pwrseq) used to power on Bluetooth & Wi-Fi combo chip, both
> Bluetooth and
>
> Wi-Fi driver need to control "chip-en-gpios" pins, so we introduced the
> power sequence module.
>
> What should we call it in this case?
Sorry, you describe driver, not a device.
That would be a no-go for entire binding. Please describe the hardware,
not what you want to achieve in Linux drivers.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists